The 29th Conference of the Parties (COP29) arrived at a critical moment in the global effort to address climate change. As nations confront increasing climate disasters, the spotlight is on fulfilling and surpassing the long-overdue $100 billion annual climate finance pledge. Emerging economies, often bearing the brunt of climate impacts, are closely watching to see if COP29 can deliver tangible results. Can this conference break past barriers and set a new course for meaningful climate finance, or will the same roadblocks persist?

At COP29, global leaders committed to a new financial target under the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG). This includes scaling up climate finance to $300 billion annually by 2035 and a long-term vision of mobilizing $1.3 trillion per year.
Like previous pledges, this committment emphasizes funding for adaptation, mitigation, and loss and damage, ensuring that vulnerable countries have the resources to combat and recover from climate impacts.
Despite these ambitious goals, the specifics of how these funds will be delivered and distributed remain unclear, leaving many to question the feasibility of the NCQG. Emerging nations have called for increased committment amount, simplified access to funds and equitable allocation, but whether COP29 can turn these promises into reality remains uncertain.

While the NCQG sets an ambitious direction, it lacks several critical elements:

• No clear obligations: The agreement fails to establish mandatory grant provisions, leaving developing nations vulnerable to mounting debt.
• Limited loss and damage funding: Rich nations blocked the inclusion of dedicated funds for loss and damage, a key demand from vulnerable nations.
• Weak innovative financing provisions: Despite recognizing innovative funding sources, the NCQG lacks strong commitments to implement mechanisms like levies or taxes.
• Insufficient detail on access: Promises to enhance access to climate finance remain vague, with no concrete actions outlined.

However, ​one of COP29’s successes was advancing the Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), a framework to track progress on adaptation measures. The GGA incorporates indicators tailored to local circumstances, guided by human-rights-based principles. This progress provides hope for improving climate resilience, particularly for communities on the front lines of climate change

​The unmet $100 billion annual climate finance target, first pledged in 2009, upscaled to $300 billion annually by 2035 undermines trust in global climate agreements. Developed nations must not only deliver on this promise but scale their contributions to address the escalating climate crisis. Economic downturns and shifting priorities among donor countries have delayed or reduced climate finance contributions.
​The war in Ukraine has diverted critical resources away from sustainability initiatives, intensifying challenges in meeting the 2030 Agenda. Budget allocations have been redirected to bolster national security, address humanitarian crises, and ensure energy security. The conflict has led to a sharp rise in energy prices, disrupted global supply chains, and placed immense financial strain on governments. In response, many countries have subsidized energy costs to support households and businesses, while also reviving fossil fuel projects as an emergency measure to reduce reliance on Russian energy. At the same time, developed nations have accelerated renewable energy development to establish long-term energy sovereignty and reduce future vulnerabilities.

​Emerging economies face significant bureaucratic hurdles when accessing climate finance while ​Fragmented efforts among donors and institutions lead to inefficiencies, reducing the impact of available funds. Simplifying application processes and ensuring transparency will expedite fund disbursement and increase trust. ​Streamlining access to climate finance through AI and technology is a key pillar for the success of the COP29 Pledge.
​By leveraging advanced technologies, the process of identifying, allocating, and disbursing funds can be made faster, more efficient, and transparent. These innovations enable better matching of resources to the most urgent climate needs, ensuring equitable distribution and maximizing the impact of climate finance efforts.

​A disproportionate share of climate funds often bypasses the most vulnerable countries. To address this, COP29 must emphasize equitable allocation and prioritize nations most affected by climate change. The success of COP29 will lie into the ability to programme and allocate funds towards most vulnerable countries.

Streamlining financing mechanisms, prioritizing grants over loans, focusing on localized impact: to support community-driven adaptation and mitigation projects, will foster the delivery of more tangible results. Moreover, channeling funds through multilateral development banks and empowering local governments and community organizations, while fostering capacity building and knowledge sharing with vunerable populations will enhance  funding impact. In addition, Innovative green finance solutions such as green bonds and country risks insurance or debt swaps for climate action can provide struggling economies with much-needed financial breathing room to receive funds and invest in sustainability.

​Public funds alone cannot close the climate finance gap. Incentives like green bonds, private and public partnerships,  and tax breaks can attract private sector contributions, amplifying the impact of public funding. For example, the IRA provided significant fund and tax incentives to encourage private investment in renewable energy technologies such as solar, wind, and battery storage and accelerated utility-scale and distributed Energy Projects. The IRA established in particular a $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (Green Bank) to mobilize private investments in clean energy projects, especially in underserved communities.

​Beyond these tax incentives and funding mechanisms, efforts must also focus on addressing supply chain bottlenecks, modernizing the energy grid, and streamlining queuing processes. Additionally, lifting local barriers, such as lengthy permitting processes and restrictive policies, is essential to accelerate project approvals and advance energy transition developments effectively.​
Implementing global solidarity levies on high-emission industries, such as aviation and maritime, will also help create dedicated funding for vulnerable nations.

​Without a clear framework outlining how much each developed country should contribute, financial obligations are often vague and unmet. Establishing clear accountability mechanisms is essential to track progress and ensure that nations meet their financial commitments.​

​Despite its ambitions, the NCQG falls short of addressing the pressing needs of vulnerable communities. A lack of binding commitments, reliance on loans, and insufficient funding for loss and damage create significant challenges. However, there are opportunities to build momentum:

• The “Baku to Belém Roadmap”, designed to achieve the $1.3 trillion target, could provide a pathway for stronger climate finance mechanisms at the next COP in Brazil.
• Advocacy for innovative funding solutions, such as solidarity levies, must continue to gain traction.
• Efforts outside the UNFCCC process, like strengthening locally-led adaptation projects, can complement global initiatives.

COP29 underscores the need for immediate, bold action to scale up climate finance. Emerging economies cannot afford further delays or inadequate funding. The global community must prioritize equitable, accessible, and impactful climate finance mechanisms to address the escalating climate crisis. The world is watching—will COP29 deliver on its promises or perpetuate the cycle of unmet commitments? Only time will tell if the NCQG can unlock the financial resources needed to secure a sustainable future.

This article is presented by EnableGreen, a leading sustainability recruitment and executive search firm committed to helping organizations build top-tier teams that drive their sustainability goals forward. We specialize in recruiting exceptional talent across key sectors, including ESG and sustainability integration,renewable energy and cleantech, climate finance, sustainable finance and impact investment, health and safety, and environment jobs. We provide a diverse range of opportunities, including leaderships roles and experts roles such as CSO, ESG Analyst,  climate chage and energy jobs, and sustainable finance careers. Visit our website www.enable.green to explore our job listings and learn more about our recruitment and executive search services.. The perspectives shared in this article reflect our opinions alone.